I found a form on the "Contact Us" page on the TPWD site and submitted a very detailed argument. The flawed reasoning for the entire discussion lies below:
MR. DAUGHERTY: We are doing some. Dan Bennett, who is one of our management biologists over in Tyler, conducted -- has been working really close with a lot of the boat* fishing clubs over there on the Trinity River over the last four to five years and he's collected some pretty interesting data. He conducted an angler survey -- well, he conducted a survey, an angler survey, over there and based on the results of his survey, suggested about 70 -- 77, I want to say, percent of the Alligator Gar harvest was by bow anglers. The remaining --
*I believe this to be a transcript typo - probably should be BOW
COMMISSIONER MORIAN: 70 percent?
MR. DAUGHERTY: 77 percent. The remaining 23 percent was hook and line, jug line, so on and so forth, yeah. So the majority of our effort is definitely coming from the bow angling community.
So, OF THE PEOPLE SURVEYED in boat (or bow, whichever it may be) fishing CLUBS, the vast majority were from bow harvests... Anyone know of a bass, catfish, or crappie CLUB on the Trinity? This was obviously NOT a scientific survey nor a large enough sample size of the total number of fish harvested to even be valid. And the fact that he hesitated and restated whether it was an angler survey, a survey, or an angler survey leaves me sure of it.
The argument needs to be about science. Where are the numbers reflecting total harvest statewide? Where are the method specific numbers based on scientific surveys? Heck, where are the numbers reflecting actual fish population estimates via scientific method? My guess is they don't exist.
I will also be joining the TBA.