BowFishing Country banner
41 - 57 of 57 Posts
stickemdeep, is talking about my little DiamondBack 13'3/7'9 120 bottom 90 sides 60 bow&transom the sketch part is only 14 inch sides
LS3 fuel injection GM hot cam 3 78inch R blades
I get great gas mileage turning 5400 RPM on cruise night can ride around turning 2800/3000
Race night 6200 RPM still not bad ride around turning 3400
Cool, thanks for the info. I was looking pretty intently on the 14x7 Elite mini. It has much taller sides though, even if it lacks in the HP department.
 
That was the only thing I didn't like about his boat sides are short as heck and transforms low to. Great motor though
 
I have a 100 gallon fuel tank......... take that how ever you want....
Tell ya how I took it, I assume Super Unleaded so I think $350-$375 to fill up your rig so it made me feel really good about putting $30 to top off my 15 Gallon Tank every third trip out to fuel my measley 90HP Yamaha... I never take fishing buddies money because I was going anyway.

If I had your gas bill, I'd shake'm down like a hooded gangsta wanna be to pay for gas!
 
Cool, thanks for the info. I was looking pretty intently on the 14x7 Elite mini. It has much taller sides though, even if it lacks in the HP department.
I going to get one after my full size is paid for, got a 43 hrp motor that work great.
 
I have fished out of a fan boat a lot and an air boat once. I was always concerned with fuel bill as well. BUT after I went in one it got me to thinking in a different way.

I thought of it not in gallons burned per night, but in area covered per gallon or potential fish seen per gallon. If we get the fan boat stuck in shallow water it could be 10 mins before we get out and back to fishing. airboat just hit the gas 20 seconds later shoot a fish... If we were in the fan boat that night it would have taken us all night to shoot 100 fish. In the airboat we had 220 by 1 oclock...

when you look at the time wasted getting a boat unstuck or idling an outboard out of a stump filled area or not being able to get to the fish because they are laid up in 2 inches of water. factor in all that and an airboat all the sudden seems like a bargain... to me of course.

The fuel bill may be 3 or 4 times more but you can cover 3 to 4 times more water. so if you look at it from a (area covered per gallon of fuel) you are probably dead even with a fan boat... and a troller boat haha you are prolly spending 10 to 20 times the money in fuel but you are fishing 10 to 20 times more area.

Its all food for thought, if you are happy going out and shooting 50 fish average a night in a troller boat then keep on keepin on. if you would be happier going out and shooting 50 fish per hour average then get a airboat...

that's my opinion of course. I can tell you this as soon as I get my fiancé out of pharmacy school there will be an airboat sitting in my yard...
 
I have fished out of a fan boat a lot and an air boat once. I was always concerned with fuel bill as well. BUT after I went in one it got me to thinking in a different way.

I thought of it not in gallons burned per night, but in area covered per gallon or potential fish seen per gallon. If we get the fan boat stuck in shallow water it could be 10 mins before we get out and back to fishing. airboat just hit the gas 20 seconds later shoot a fish... If we were in the fan boat that night it would have taken us all night to shoot 100 fish. In the airboat we had 220 by 1 oclock...

when you look at the time wasted getting a boat unstuck or idling an outboard out of a stump filled area or not being able to get to the fish because they are laid up in 2 inches of water. factor in all that and an airboat all the sudden seems like a bargain... to me of course.

The fuel bill may be 3 or 4 times more but you can cover 3 to 4 times more water. so if you look at it from a (area covered per gallon of fuel) you are probably dead even with a fan boat... and a troller boat haha you are prolly spending 10 to 20 times the money in fuel but you are fishing 10 to 20 times more area.

Its all food for thought, if you are happy going out and shooting 50 fish average a night in a troller boat then keep on keepin on. if you would be happier going out and shooting 50 fish per hour average then get a airboat...

that's my opinion of course. I can tell you this as soon as I get my fiancé out of pharmacy school there will be an airboat sitting in my yard...
Sums it up.....good post!!
 
I talked to the guy at elite awhile back and I don't think they are making them now? Something about not being blue to get on plane and needing to use a bigger motor?
I spoke to Bobby about this boat as well, and he simply explained that the boat was severely underpowered. I was thinking maybe a BPS 7000 Mag would work be a better powerplant for that setup. It's basically a built 40hp Vangard with dual carbs, performance heads, valves, etc. It gets around 65hp. I realize this boat isn't perfect and it certainly won't run dry, but for someone looking for a boat for shallow water shooting, it would work.

It's either that or perhaps a smaller (15x7 - 16x8) boat with a 350 sbc and a 2 or 3 blade prop.
 
Just build it like a deep hull race boat
 
you could always go with a 160, 180, 200 lycome and have plenty push and great gas milage
you will spend a little more for a good schmidt, or jr jurnigan, built motor but last a long time
could even put a 100 shot (nos) on it for sticky situations, Yeah and on the right hull will run dry
 
you could always go with a 160, 180, 200 lycome and have plenty push and great gas milage
you will spend a little more for a good schmidt, or jr jurnigan, built motor but last a long time
could even put a 100 shot (nos) on it for sticky situations, Yeah and on the right hull will run dry
I have thought about going this route, but living in Michigan it isn't easy to find these engines locally, find someone to work on them, or find parts to rebuild these these engines without paying to have them shipped.
 
I have fished out of a fan boat a lot and an air boat once. I was always concerned with fuel bill as well. BUT after I went in one it got me to thinking in a different way.

I thought of it not in gallons burned per night, but in area covered per gallon or potential fish seen per gallon. If we get the fan boat stuck in shallow water it could be 10 mins before we get out and back to fishing. airboat just hit the gas 20 seconds later shoot a fish... If we were in the fan boat that night it would have taken us all night to shoot 100 fish. In the airboat we had 220 by 1 oclock...

when you look at the time wasted getting a boat unstuck or idling an outboard out of a stump filled area or not being able to get to the fish because they are laid up in 2 inches of water. factor in all that and an airboat all the sudden seems like a bargain... to me of course.

The fuel bill may be 3 or 4 times more but you can cover 3 to 4 times more water. so if you look at it from a (area covered per gallon of fuel) you are probably dead even with a fan boat... and a troller boat haha you are prolly spending 10 to 20 times the money in fuel but you are fishing 10 to 20 times more area.

Its all food for thought, if you are happy going out and shooting 50 fish average a night in a troller boat then keep on keepin on. if you would be happier going out and shooting 50 fish per hour average then get a airboat...

that's my opinion of course. I can tell you this as soon as I get my fiancé out of pharmacy school there will be an airboat sitting in my yard...
Hmm, and people say Airboats don't have an advantage..
 
41 - 57 of 57 Posts