BowFishing Country banner
41 - 60 of 200 Posts
the displacement theory is the reason I went 24' long. 72" bottom... hull weight of 986 lbs, .125 thickness I draft 8" with a full load of fish and 4 guys...as long as the channel is 25' wide ill get it turned around. last weekend I was on a 1756 and we could barely get into 1 foot of water. after we filled the fish tub it was outright dangerous going across the lake. maybe im lacking brass, but I have swam before and I don't intend on doing it again. theorys fail, opinions stink,, math never lies
Without seeing the 1754 you referring to and being able to take hard measurements I took a few liberties with the math. 1754 with 80" beam and 24" side will roughly displace 1250 gallons of water. That's about 5 tons of water. I'm not saying that's a safe number, just stating if it was a tank that's how much it would hold.

When you say it was dangerous how much weight do you think you guys had in the boat. Fish, gear and guys?
 
Are you taking the length of the rake into consideration for those calculations?
My bad, guess I need to read a lil slower. Just found where you said 5' rakes
 
Discussion starter · #44 ·
Ive got a 20/84 with 36 inch sides its 102 beam its like a bobber it will almost run dry with the troller lol it drafts in 8 inches easy with 3 guys and several hundred pounds of fish . Ive got a 200 hp mercury on it and it will run 40 plus loaded with fish and an easy 45 with 4 people and no fish .
that sounds beautiful.



 
yes, doing a 5' rake for all boats. another good point Kajun. and another factor to accommodate. I know you like a 4' rake for optimizing displacement.
I actually use 5' rakes for 30" tall sides. I wouldn't get down to 4' rake unless sides were 24" or less.
 
Some people just freak out when they see the word math! haha. I dont blame you for planning ahead.
 
I tried searching and couldn't find the thread where Brady's truck, pretty sure it was Brady, got stuck on an island during a flood. And the brought it a fairly good sized Jon and got the truck back to dry land.

How big was that boat, good demonstration on how much weight you can stack on a boat.
 
Airboat hull... <a href=http://s270.photobucket.com/albums/jj110/wbg444/?action=view&current=IMAG1494.jpg target=_blank><img src=http://i270.photobucket.com/albums/jj110/wbg444/IMAG1494.jpg border=0 alt=></a>
 
I have read all through this and Rambo I believe your onto something with the math to build the "perfect" boat. But perfect for what application? I mean we all fish different locations and different terrain. I have fished off pretty much every boat and every size you possibly can and they all work good for specifics circumstances. Yes the airboat will get in some very skinny water to shoot numbers but we have guys in fan boats beat the airboats regular here. So technically the airboats here just have the advantage to cross dry ground to get to holes that can't be fished otherwise. I personally shoot off a fan boat and love it. It's what works best for me. I can get in some real skinny water but at the same time get on plane in deep water fast as well. My perfect boat will be the one that I own once I install my new prop and reduction this winter. Oh and the actuator steering!:D
 
Discussion starter · #56 ·
I have read all through this and Rambo I believe your onto something with the math to build the "perfect" boat. But perfect for what application? I mean we all fish different locations and different terrain. I have fished off pretty much every boat and every size you possibly can and they all work good for specifics circumstances. Yes the airboat will get in some very skinny water to shoot numbers but we have guys in fan boats beat the airboats regular here. So technically the airboats here just have the advantage to cross dry ground to get to holes that can't be fished otherwise. I personally shoot off a fan boat and love it. It's what works best for me. I can get in some real skinny water but at the same time get on plane in deep water fast as well. My perfect boat will be the one that I own once I install my new prop and reduction this winter. Oh and the actuator steering!:D
man, this is gonna stir the pot. but ill give you a honest answer for what I "currently" believe. I truly believe a fan boat is the most capable boat. I believe a jet boat is the best choice for running all types of water. and I believe a investment should be protected (uhmw). The perfect boat needs to be safe in deep swells, strong enough to glide the rock shoals, powerful enough to haul a heavy load, yet light enough for the fan to push the mud. what I don't know is if its possible.

Even though I caint afford to build the perfect boat I believe the most capable boat would be a poly covered extra wide bottom with 26-28" sides, a forward center console that is covered by a lid in the back of the front raised deck, 16" walk arounds, a large troller that folds into a hatch, a big 4stroke jet outboard behind a tunnel, and a 54" 6 blade prop sitting low. all in a 3000lb goal weight.



 
man, this is gonna stir the pot. but ill give you a honest answer for what I "currently" believe. I truly believe a fan boat is the most capable boat. I believe a jet boat is the best choice for running all types of water. and I believe a investment should be protected (uhmw). The perfect boat needs to be safe in deep swells, strong enough to glide the rock shoals, powerful enough to haul a heavy load, yet light enough for the fan to push the mud. what I don't know is if its possible.

Even though I caint afford to build the perfect boat I believe the most capable boat would be a poly covered extra wide bottom with 26-28" sides, a forward center console that is covered by a lid in the back of the front raised deck, 16" walk arounds, a large troller that folds into a hatch, a big 4stroke jet outboard behind a tunnel, and a 54" 6 blade prop sitting low. all in a 3000lb goal weight.
what you said is possible but would our patience and wallet.
 
41 - 60 of 200 Posts